5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
commit 71492580571467fb7177aade19c18ce7486267f5 upstream.
Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning.
Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade().
Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.c... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -3535,6 +3535,9 @@ static int __lock_downgrade(struct lockd unsigned int depth; int i;
+ if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) + return 0; + depth = curr->lockdep_depth; /* * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock,