4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 891cb2a72d821f930a39d5900cb7a3aa752c1d5b ]
Rong Chen has reported the following boot crash:
PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-00149-gefad4e4 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80 Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 da <48> 8b 53 08 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48 RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 000000000000000a RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff88801e5c0000 RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 0000000001b64d13 R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88801e640000 R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 Call Trace: __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0 is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0 removable_show+0x87/0xa0 dev_attr_show+0x25/0x60 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xba/0x110 seq_read+0x196/0x3f0 __vfs_read+0x34/0x180 vfs_read+0xa0/0x150 ksys_read+0x44/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0x4a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
and bisected it down to commit efad4e475c31 ("mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone").
The reason for the crash is that the mapping is garbage for poisoned (uninitialized) page. This shouldn't happen as all pages in the zone's boundary should be initialized.
Later debugging revealed that the actual problem is an off-by-one when evaluating the end_page. 'start_pfn + nr_pages' resp 'zone_end_pfn' refers to a pfn after the range and as such it might belong to a differen memory section.
This along with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM then makes the loop condition completely bogus because a pointer arithmetic doesn't work for pages from two different sections in that memory model.
Fix the issue by reworking is_pageblock_removable to be pfn based and only use struct page where necessary. This makes the code slightly easier to follow and we will remove the problematic pointer arithmetic completely.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190218181544.14616-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: efad4e475c31 ("mm, memory_hotplug: is_mem_section_removable do not pass the end of a zone") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko mhocko@suse.com Reported-by: rong.a.chen@intel.com Tested-by: rong.a.chen@intel.com Acked-by: Mike Rapoport rppt@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador osalvador@suse.de Cc: Matthew Wilcox willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index ff93a57e1694..156991edec2a 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1213,11 +1213,13 @@ static inline int pageblock_free(struct page *page) return PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order; }
-/* Return the start of the next active pageblock after a given page */ -static struct page *next_active_pageblock(struct page *page) +/* Return the pfn of the start of the next active pageblock after a given pfn */ +static unsigned long next_active_pageblock(unsigned long pfn) { + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); + /* Ensure the starting page is pageblock-aligned */ - BUG_ON(page_to_pfn(page) & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1)); + BUG_ON(pfn & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1));
/* If the entire pageblock is free, move to the end of free page */ if (pageblock_free(page)) { @@ -1225,16 +1227,16 @@ static struct page *next_active_pageblock(struct page *page) /* be careful. we don't have locks, page_order can be changed.*/ order = page_order(page); if ((order < MAX_ORDER) && (order >= pageblock_order)) - return page + (1 << order); + return pfn + (1 << order); }
- return page + pageblock_nr_pages; + return pfn + pageblock_nr_pages; }
-static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page) +static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(unsigned long pfn) { + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); struct zone *zone; - unsigned long pfn;
/* * We have to be careful here because we are iterating over memory @@ -1257,13 +1259,14 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page) /* Checks if this range of memory is likely to be hot-removable. */ bool is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages) { - struct page *page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn); - unsigned long end_pfn = min(start_pfn + nr_pages, zone_end_pfn(page_zone(page))); - struct page *end_page = pfn_to_page(end_pfn); + unsigned long end_pfn, pfn; + + end_pfn = min(start_pfn + nr_pages, + zone_end_pfn(page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn))));
/* Check the starting page of each pageblock within the range */ - for (; page < end_page; page = next_active_pageblock(page)) { - if (!is_pageblock_removable_nolock(page)) + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn = next_active_pageblock(pfn)) { + if (!is_pageblock_removable_nolock(pfn)) return false; cond_resched(); }