Hello,
The original patch is already in linux-6.8.y, so I submitted the patch for the previous branches:
- linux-6.2.y: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240815183641.7875-1-sergio.collado@gmail.co... - linux-6.4.y: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240815185026.8573-1-sergio.collado@gmail.co... - linux-6.5.y: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240815190146.9213-1-sergio.collado@gmail.co... - linux-6.6.y: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240815191047.9737-1-sergio.collado@gmail.co...
I have not addressed the branches linux-6.3.y and linux-6.7.y as those are EOL: - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230709111451.101012554@linuxfoundation.org/ - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240401152553.125349965@linuxfoundation.org/
Please let me know if something is off.
Sergio
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 16:37, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:13:15PM +0200, Sergio González Collado wrote:
From: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleikamp@oracle.com
[ Upstream commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656 ]
In order to make array bounds checking sane, provide a separate definition of the in-inode xtree root and the external xtree page.
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp dave.kleikamp@oracle.com Tested-by: Manas Ghandat ghandatmanas@gmail.com (cherry picked from commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656) Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+6b1d79dad6cc6b3eef41@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
What about 6.6.y? We can't take commits only to older kernels, that would mean you would have a regression.
Please resubmit for all relevant branches.
greg k-h