5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ismael Luceno iluceno@suse.de
[ Upstream commit e10d3ba4d434ed172914617ed8d74bd411421193 ]
It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when disabling GSO.
IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support") Co-developed-by: Firo Yang firo.yang@suse.com Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno iluceno@suse.de Tested-by: Andreas Taschner andreas.taschner@suse.com Acked-by: Julian Anastasov ja@ssi.bg Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c index a0921adc31a9f..1e689c7141271 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum || skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { sctph->source = cp->vport; - sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff); + if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb)) + sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff); } else { skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; } @@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp, (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL && !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) { sctph->dest = cp->dport; - sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff); + if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb)) + sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff); } else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; }