On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:27:21PM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:35:31AM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
From: Henrik Austad haustad@cisco.com
Short story:
Sorry for the spam, it looks like I was not very specific in /which/ version I targeted this to, as well as not providing a full Cc-list for the cover-letter.
Gentle prod. I realize this was sent out just before plumbers and that people had pretty packed agendas, so a small nudge to gain a spot closer to the top of the inbox :)
This series has now been running on an arm64 system for 9 days without any issues and pi_stress showed a dramatic improvement from ~30 seconds and up to several ours (it finally deadlocked at 3.9e9 inversions).
I'd greatly appreciate if someone could give the list of patches a quick glance to verify that I got all the required patches and then if it could be added to 4.4.y.
This is a really intrusive series of patches, and without some testing and verification by others, I am really reluctant to take these patches.
Why not just move to the 4.9.y tree, or better yet, 4.19.y to resolve this issue for your systems?
thanks,
greg k-h