21 Jul
2020
21 Jul
'20
9:24 p.m.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:02:44 +0000 "Ruhl, Michael J" michael.j.ruhl@intel.com wrote:
--- a/include/linux/io-mapping.h~io-mapping-indicate-mapping-failure-fix +++ a/include/linux/io-mapping.h @@ -107,9 +107,12 @@ io_mapping_init_wc(struct io_mapping *io resource_size_t base, unsigned long size) {
- iomap->iomem = ioremap_wc(base, size);
- if (!iomap->iomem)
return NULL;This does make more sense.
I am confused by the two follow up emails I just got.
One was your original patch, the other is my suggested alteration.
Shall I resubmit, or is this path (if !iomap->iomem) return NULL) now in the tree.
All is OK. If my alteration is acceptable (and, preferably, tested!) then when the time comes, I'll fold it into the base patch, add a note indicating this change and shall then send it to Linus.