The patch titled Subject: mm/hugetlb: add missing hugetlb_lock in __unmap_hugepage_range() has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is mm-hugetlb-add-missing-hugetlb_lock-in-__unmap_hugepage_range.patch
This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches...
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------ From: Jeongjun Park aha310510@gmail.com Subject: mm/hugetlb: add missing hugetlb_lock in __unmap_hugepage_range() Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 03:21:15 +0900
When restoring a reservation for an anonymous page, we need to check to freeing a surplus. However, __unmap_hugepage_range() causes data race because it reads h->surplus_huge_pages without the protection of hugetlb_lock.
And adjust_reservation is a boolean variable that indicates whether reservations for anonymous pages in each folio should be restored. Therefore, it should be initialized to false for each round of the loop. However, this variable is not initialized to false except when defining the current adjust_reservation variable.
This means that once adjust_reservation is set to true even once within the loop, reservations for anonymous pages will be restored unconditionally in all subsequent rounds, regardless of the folio's state.
To fix this, we need to add the missing hugetlb_lock, unlock the page_table_lock earlier so that we don't lock the hugetlb_lock inside the page_table_lock lock, and initialize adjust_reservation to false on each round within the loop.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250823182115.1193563-1-aha310510@gmail.com Fixes: df7a6d1f6405 ("mm/hugetlb: restore the reservation if needed") Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park aha310510@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+417aeb05fd190f3a6da9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=417aeb05fd190f3a6da9 Cc: Breno Leitao leitao@debian.org Cc: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com Cc: Muchun Song muchun.song@linux.dev Cc: Oscar Salvador osalvador@suse.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
mm/hugetlb.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-add-missing-hugetlb_lock-in-__unmap_hugepage_range +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -5851,7 +5851,7 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g spinlock_t *ptl; struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma); unsigned long sz = huge_page_size(h); - bool adjust_reservation = false; + bool adjust_reservation; unsigned long last_addr_mask; bool force_flush = false;
@@ -5944,6 +5944,7 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g sz); hugetlb_count_sub(pages_per_huge_page(h), mm); hugetlb_remove_rmap(folio); + spin_unlock(ptl);
/* * Restore the reservation for anonymous page, otherwise the @@ -5951,14 +5952,16 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g * If there we are freeing a surplus, do not set the restore * reservation bit. */ + adjust_reservation = false; + + spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock); if (!h->surplus_huge_pages && __vma_private_lock(vma) && folio_test_anon(folio)) { folio_set_hugetlb_restore_reserve(folio); /* Reservation to be adjusted after the spin lock */ adjust_reservation = true; } - - spin_unlock(ptl); + spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
/* * Adjust the reservation for the region that will have the _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from aha310510@gmail.com are
mm-hugetlb-add-missing-hugetlb_lock-in-__unmap_hugepage_range.patch