27 Nov
2018
27 Nov
'18
6:18 p.m.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:58:49 +0000 Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
This looks fine to me, but I'm curious about whether this is supposed to work with compat syscalls as well, where the prefix is "__arm64_compat_".
If we broadly follow the x86 lead, we'd have:
return (!strncmp(sym, "__arm64_", 8) && !strcmp(sym + 8, name)) || (!strncmp(sym, "__arm64_compat_", 15) && !strcmp(sym + 15, name));
Do we need to handle compat (i.e. 32-bit) tasks here?
Only if you want to trace compat syscalls as well ;-)
-- Steve