From: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 34f0677e7afd3a292bc1aadda7ce8e35faedb204 ]
Fix wrong order of frame index vs register/slot index in precision propagation verbose (level 2) output. It's wrong and very confusing as is.
Fixes: 529409ea92d5 ("bpf: propagate precision across all frames, not just the last one") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313184017.4083374-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index a53ba87a1cd2a..df353ba844f41 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -13678,7 +13678,7 @@ static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, !(state_reg->live & REG_LIVE_READ)) continue; if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) - verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating r%d\n", i, fr); + verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating r%d\n", fr, i); err = mark_chain_precision_frame(env, fr, i); if (err < 0) return err; @@ -13694,7 +13694,7 @@ static int propagate_precision(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, continue; if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL2) verbose(env, "frame %d: propagating fp%d\n", - (-i - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE, fr); + fr, (-i - 1) * BPF_REG_SIZE); err = mark_chain_precision_stack_frame(env, fr, i); if (err < 0) return err;