6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Richard Genoud richard.genoud@bootlin.com
[ Upstream commit a8631f6d6344d976096b1efafdb2fbb3111bd790 ]
ret variable was used to test reset status, get from reset_control_status() call. But this variable was overwritten by ti_sci_proc_get_status() a few lines bellow. And as ti_sci_proc_get_status() returns 0 or a negative value (in this latter case, followed by a return), the expression !ret was always true,
Clearly, this was not what was intended: In the comment above it's said that "requires both local and module resets to be deasserted"; if reset_control_status() returns 0 it means that the reset line is deasserted. So, it's pretty clear that the return value of reset_control_status() was intended to be used instead of ti_sci_proc_get_status() return value.
This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and halted == 0. In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead of a mismatched mode.
Fixes: 1168af40b1ad ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs") Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud richard.genoud@bootlin.com Reviewed-by: Hari Nagalla hnagalla@ti.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621150058.319524-2-richard.genoud@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index 50e486bcfa103..39a47540c5900 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama; struct k3_r5_core *core0; enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode; + int reset_ctrl_status; int ret;
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); @@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) r_state, c_state); }
- ret = reset_control_status(core->reset); - if (ret < 0) { + reset_ctrl_status = reset_control_status(core->reset); + if (reset_ctrl_status < 0) { dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n", - ret); - return ret; + reset_ctrl_status); + return reset_ctrl_status; }
/* @@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) * irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset * deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode */ - if (c_state && !ret && !halted) { + if (c_state && !reset_ctrl_status && !halted) { dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n"); kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED; ret = 1; @@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) ret = 0; } else { dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n", - !ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted", + !reset_ctrl_status ? "deasserted" : "asserted", c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted", halted ? "halted" : "unhalted"); ret = -EINVAL;