6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org
commit a6629626c584200daf495cc9a740048b455addcd upstream.
The test_event_printk() analyzes print formats of trace events looking for cases where it may dereference a pointer that is not in the ring buffer which can possibly be a bug when the trace event is read from the ring buffer and the content of that pointer no longer exists.
The function needs to accurately go from one print format argument to the next. It handles quotes and parenthesis that may be included in an argument. When it finds the start of the next argument, it uses a simple "c = strstr(fmt + i, ',')" to find the end of that argument!
In order to include "%s" dereferencing, it needs to process the entire content of the print format argument and not just the content of the first ',' it finds. As there may be content like:
({ const char *saved_ptr = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p); static const char *access_str[] = { "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" }; union kvm_mmu_page_role role; role.word = REC->role; trace_seq_printf(p, "sp gen %u gfn %llx l%u %u-byte q%u%s %s%s" " %snxe %sad root %u %s%c", REC->mmu_valid_gen, REC->gfn, role.level, role.has_4_byte_gpte ? 4 : 8, role.quadrant, role.direct ? " direct" : "", access_str[role.access], role.invalid ? " invalid" : "", role.efer_nx ? "" : "!", role.ad_disabled ? "!" : "", REC->root_count, REC->unsync ? "unsync" : "sync", 0); saved_ptr; })
Which is an example of a full argument of an existing event. As the code already handles finding the next print format argument, process the argument at the end of it and not the start of it. This way it has both the start of the argument as well as the end of it.
Add a helper function "process_pointer()" that will do the processing during the loop as well as at the end. It also makes the code cleaner and easier to read.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Al Viro viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241217024720.362271189@goodmis.org Fixes: 5013f454a352c ("tracing: Add check of trace event print fmts for dereferencing pointers") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) rostedt@goodmis.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c @@ -265,8 +265,7 @@ static bool test_field(const char *fmt, len = p - fmt;
for (; field->type; field++) { - if (strncmp(field->name, fmt, len) || - field->name[len]) + if (strncmp(field->name, fmt, len) || field->name[len]) continue; array_descriptor = strchr(field->type, '['); /* This is an array and is OK to dereference. */ @@ -275,6 +274,32 @@ static bool test_field(const char *fmt, return false; }
+/* Return true if the argument pointer is safe */ +static bool process_pointer(const char *fmt, int len, struct trace_event_call *call) +{ + const char *r, *e, *a; + + e = fmt + len; + + /* Find the REC-> in the argument */ + r = strstr(fmt, "REC->"); + if (r && r < e) { + /* + * Addresses of events on the buffer, or an array on the buffer is + * OK to dereference. There's ways to fool this, but + * this is to catch common mistakes, not malicious code. + */ + a = strchr(fmt, '&'); + if ((a && (a < r)) || test_field(r, call)) + return true; + } else if ((r = strstr(fmt, "__get_dynamic_array(")) && r < e) { + return true; + } else if ((r = strstr(fmt, "__get_sockaddr(")) && r < e) { + return true; + } + return false; +} + /* * Examine the print fmt of the event looking for unsafe dereference * pointers using %p* that could be recorded in the trace event and @@ -285,12 +310,12 @@ static void test_event_printk(struct tra { u64 dereference_flags = 0; bool first = true; - const char *fmt, *c, *r, *a; + const char *fmt; int parens = 0; char in_quote = 0; int start_arg = 0; int arg = 0; - int i; + int i, e;
fmt = call->print_fmt;
@@ -403,42 +428,41 @@ static void test_event_printk(struct tra case ',': if (in_quote || parens) continue; + e = i; i++; while (isspace(fmt[i])) i++; - start_arg = i; - if (!(dereference_flags & (1ULL << arg))) - goto next_arg;
- /* Find the REC-> in the argument */ - c = strchr(fmt + i, ','); - r = strstr(fmt + i, "REC->"); - if (r && (!c || r < c)) { - /* - * Addresses of events on the buffer, - * or an array on the buffer is - * OK to dereference. - * There's ways to fool this, but - * this is to catch common mistakes, - * not malicious code. - */ - a = strchr(fmt + i, '&'); - if ((a && (a < r)) || test_field(r, call)) + /* + * If start_arg is zero, then this is the start of the + * first argument. The processing of the argument happens + * when the end of the argument is found, as it needs to + * handle paranthesis and such. + */ + if (!start_arg) { + start_arg = i; + /* Balance out the i++ in the for loop */ + i--; + continue; + } + + if (dereference_flags & (1ULL << arg)) { + if (process_pointer(fmt + start_arg, e - start_arg, call)) dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); - } else if ((r = strstr(fmt + i, "__get_dynamic_array(")) && - (!c || r < c)) { - dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); - } else if ((r = strstr(fmt + i, "__get_sockaddr(")) && - (!c || r < c)) { - dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); }
- next_arg: - i--; + start_arg = i; arg++; + /* Balance out the i++ in the for loop */ + i--; } }
+ if (dereference_flags & (1ULL << arg)) { + if (process_pointer(fmt + start_arg, i - start_arg, call)) + dereference_flags &= ~(1ULL << arg); + } + /* * If you triggered the below warning, the trace event reported * uses an unsafe dereference pointer %p*. As the data stored