6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Edward Cree ecree.xilinx@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 8241ecec1cdc6699ae197d52d58e76bddd995fa5 ]
Since cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also ef100_check_design_params() run before efx->net_dev is created; consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this point. Move those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.
Reported-by: Kyungwook Boo bookyungwook@gmail.com Fixes: 98ff4c7c8ac7 ("sfc: Separate netdev probe/remove from PCI probe/remove") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree ecree.xilinx@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250401225439.2401047-1-edward.cree@amd.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c | 6 ++-- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c | 47 +++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c index d941f073f1ebf..3a06e3b1bd6bf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c @@ -450,8 +450,9 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data) net_dev->hw_enc_features |= efx->type->offload_features; net_dev->vlan_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_ALL_TSO; - netif_set_tso_max_segs(net_dev, - ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS_DEFAULT); + nic_data = efx->nic_data; + netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_len); + netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev, nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs);
rc = efx_ef100_init_datapath_caps(efx); if (rc < 0) @@ -477,7 +478,6 @@ int ef100_probe_netdev(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data) /* Don't fail init if RSS setup doesn't work. */ efx_mcdi_push_default_indir_table(efx, efx->n_rx_channels);
- nic_data = efx->nic_data; rc = ef100_get_mac_address(efx, net_dev->perm_addr, CLIENT_HANDLE_SELF, efx->type->is_vf); if (rc) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c index 62e674d6ff60c..3ad95a4c8af2d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c @@ -887,8 +887,7 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx, case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS: /* We always put HDR_NUM_SEGS=1 in our TSO descriptors */ if (!reader->value) { - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n"); + pci_err(efx->pci_dev, "TSO_MAX_HDR_NUM_SEGS < 1\n"); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } return 0; @@ -901,32 +900,28 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx, */ if (!reader->value || reader->value > EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE || EFX_MIN_DMAQ_SIZE % (u32)reader->value) { - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n", - reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ", - reader->value); + pci_err(efx->pci_dev, + "%s size granularity is %llu, can't guarantee safety\n", + reader->type == ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RXQ_SIZE_GRANULARITY ? "RXQ" : "TXQ", + reader->value); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } return 0; case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN: nic_data->tso_max_payload_len = min_t(u64, reader->value, GSO_LEGACY_MAX_SIZE); - netif_set_tso_max_size(efx->net_dev, - nic_data->tso_max_payload_len); return 0; case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_PAYLOAD_NUM_SEGS: nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff); - netif_set_tso_max_segs(efx->net_dev, - nic_data->tso_max_payload_num_segs); return 0; case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_TSO_MAX_NUM_FRAMES: nic_data->tso_max_frames = min_t(u64, reader->value, 0xffff); return 0; case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_COMPAT: if (reader->value) { - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n", - reader->value); + pci_err(efx->pci_dev, + "DP_COMPAT has unknown bits %#llx, driver not compatible with this hw\n", + reader->value); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } return 0; @@ -946,10 +941,10 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx, * So the value of this shouldn't matter. */ if (reader->value != ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_VI_STRIDES_DEFAULT) - netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask " - "%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n", - reader->value); + pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev, + "NIC has other than default VI_STRIDES (mask " + "%#llx), early probing might use wrong one\n", + reader->value); return 0; case ESE_EF100_DP_GZ_RX_MAX_RUNT: /* Driver doesn't look at L2_STATUS:LEN_ERR bit, so we don't @@ -961,9 +956,9 @@ static int ef100_process_design_param(struct efx_nic *efx, /* Host interface says "Drivers should ignore design parameters * that they do not recognise." */ - netif_dbg(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n", - reader->type); + pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev, + "Ignoring unrecognised design parameter %u\n", + reader->type); return 0; } } @@ -999,13 +994,13 @@ static int ef100_check_design_params(struct efx_nic *efx) */ if (reader.state != EF100_TLV_TYPE) { if (reader.state == EF100_TLV_TYPE_CONT) - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n", - reader.type); + pci_err(efx->pci_dev, + "truncated design parameter (incomplete type %u)\n", + reader.type); else - netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev, - "truncated design parameter %u\n", - reader.type); + pci_err(efx->pci_dev, + "truncated design parameter %u\n", + reader.type); rc = -EIO; } out: