The quilt patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when iputting an inode has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-fix-ocfs2-corrupt-when-iputting-an-inode.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged
------------------------------------------------------ From: Wangyan wangyan122@huawei.com Subject: ocfs2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when iputting an inode
In this condition, it will cause an bug on error. ocfs2_mkdir() ->ocfs2_mknod() ->ocfs2_mknod_locked() ->__ocfs2_mknod_locked() //Assume inode->i_generation is genN. ->inode->i_generation = osb->s_next_generation++; // The inode lockres has been initialized. ->ocfs2_populate_inode() ->ocfs2_create_new_inode_locks() ->An error happened, returned value is non-zero // free the start_bit x in bg_blkno ->ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits() ->... /* Another process execute mkdir success in this place, and it occupied the start_bit x in bg_blkno which has been freed before. Its inode->i_generation is genN + 1 */ ->iput(inode) ->evict() ->ocfs2_evict_inode() ->ocfs2_delete_inode() ->ocfs2_inode_lock() ->ocfs2_inode_lock_update() /* Bug on here, genN != genN + 1 */ ->mlog_bug_on_msg(inode->i_generation != le32_to_cpu(fe->i_generation))
So, we need not to reclaim the inode when the inode->ip_inode_lockres has been initialized. It will be freed in iput().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ef080ca3-5d74-e276-17a1-d9e7c7e662c9@huawei.com Fixes: b1529a41f777 ("ocfs2: should reclaim the inode if '__ocfs2_mknod_locked' returns an error") Signed-off-by: Yan Wang wangyan122@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jun Piao piaojun@huawei.com Cc: Mark Fasheh mark@fasheh.com Cc: Joel Becker jlbec@evilplan.org Cc: Junxiao Bi junxiao.bi@oracle.com Cc: Joseph Qi jiangqi903@gmail.com Cc: Changwei Ge gechangwei@live.cn Cc: Gang He ghe@suse.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c~ocfs2-fix-ocfs2-corrupt-when-iputting-an-inode +++ a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -641,7 +641,8 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod_locked(struct ocf status = __ocfs2_mknod_locked(dir, inode, dev, new_fe_bh, parent_fe_bh, handle, inode_ac, fe_blkno, suballoc_loc, suballoc_bit); - if (status < 0) { + if (status < 0 && !(OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres.l_flags & + OCFS2_LOCK_INITIALIZED)) { u64 bg_blkno = ocfs2_which_suballoc_group(fe_blkno, suballoc_bit); int tmp = ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits(handle, inode_ac->ac_inode, inode_ac->ac_bh, suballoc_bit, bg_blkno, 1); _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from wangyan122@huawei.com are