On 7/22/19 3:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
objtool points out several conditions that it does not like, depending on the combination with other configuration options and compiler variants:
stack protector: lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0xbf: call to __stack_chk_fail() with UACCESS enabled lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0xbe: call to __stack_chk_fail() with UACCESS enabled
stackleak plugin: lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0x4a: call to stackleak_track_stack() with UACCESS enabled lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0x4a: call to stackleak_track_stack() with UACCESS enabled
kasan: lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0x25: call to memcpy() with UACCESS enabled lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0x25: call to memcpy() with UACCESS enabled
The stackleak and kasan options just need to be disabled for this file as we do for other files already. For the stack protector, we already attempt to disable it, but this fails on clang because the check is mixed with the gcc specific -fno-conserve-stack option. According to Andrey Ryabinin, that option is not even needed, dropping it here fixes the stackprotector issue.
Fixes: d08965a27e84 ("x86/uaccess, ubsan: Fix UBSAN vs. SMAP") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190617123109.667090-1-arnd@arndb.de/t/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190722091050.2188664-1-arnd@arndb.de/t/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin aryabinin@virtuozzo.com