From: Zhiqiang Liu liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit be23e837333a914df3f24bf0b32e87b0331ab8d1 ]
coccicheck reports: drivers/md//bcache/btree.c:1538:1-7: preceding lock on line 1417
In btree_gc_coalesce func, if the coalescing process fails, we will goto to out_nocoalesce tag directly without releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock. Then, it will cause a deadlock when trying to acquire new_nodes[i]-> write_lock for freeing new_nodes[i] before return.
btree_gc_coalesce func details as follows: if alloc new_nodes[i] fails: goto out_nocoalesce; // obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock) // main coalescing process for (i = nodes - 1; i > 0; --i) [snipped] if coalescing process fails: // Here, directly goto out_nocoalesce // tag will cause a deadlock goto out_nocoalesce; [snipped] // release new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock) // coalesing succ, return return; out_nocoalesce: btree_node_free(new_nodes[i]) // free new_nodes[i] // obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock); // set flag for reuse clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &ew_nodes[i]->flags); // release new_nodes[i]->write_lock mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock);
To fix the problem, we add a new tag 'out_unlock_nocoalesce' for releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before out_nocoalesce tag. If coalescing process fails, we will go to out_unlock_nocoalesce tag for releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before free new_nodes[i] in out_nocoalesce tag.
(Coly Li helps to clean up commit log format.)
Fixes: 2a285686c109816 ("bcache: btree locking rework") Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Coly Li colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c index 96a6583e7b522..66c764491a830 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op, if (__set_blocks(n1, n1->keys + n2->keys, block_bytes(b->c)) > btree_blocks(new_nodes[i])) - goto out_nocoalesce; + goto out_unlock_nocoalesce;
keys = n2->keys; /* Take the key of the node we're getting rid of */ @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op,
if (__bch_keylist_realloc(&keylist, bkey_u64s(&new_nodes[i]->key))) - goto out_nocoalesce; + goto out_unlock_nocoalesce;
bch_btree_node_write(new_nodes[i], &cl); bch_keylist_add(&keylist, &new_nodes[i]->key); @@ -1449,6 +1449,10 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(struct btree *b, struct btree_op *op, /* Invalidated our iterator */ return -EINTR;
+out_unlock_nocoalesce: + for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) + mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock); + out_nocoalesce: closure_sync(&cl); bch_keylist_free(&keylist);