On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:20 AM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
From: Mario Limonciello mario.limonciello@amd.com
[ Upstream commit c63079c61177ba1b17fa05c6875699a36924fe39 ]
For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.
Suggested-by: Felix Held felix.held@amd.com Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2894 Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello mario.limonciello@amd.com Acked-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
FWIW, I don't think any of these UBSAN variable sized array changes are really stable material. They are not really fixing an actual issue just making UBSAN happy.
Alex
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h index 4c2eec49dadc9..94947229888ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/pptable.h @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ typedef struct _ATOM_PPLIB_THERMALCONTROLLER typedef struct _ATOM_PPLIB_STATE { UCHAR ucNonClockStateIndex;
- UCHAR ucClockStateIndices[1]; // variable-sized
- UCHAR ucClockStateIndices[]; // variable-sized
} ATOM_PPLIB_STATE;
-- 2.42.0