On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 04:16:44PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:10:30AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:19:13AM -0400, Selvin Xavier wrote:
GID entry consist of GID, vlan, netdev and smac. Extend GID duplicate check companions to consider vlan_id as well to support IPv6 VLAN based link local addresses. Introduce a new structure (bnxt_qplib_gid_info) to hold gid and vlan_id information.
The issue is discussed in the following thread https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg81594.html
Fixes: 823b23da7113 ("IB/core: Allow vlan link local address based RoCE GIDs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+ Reported-by: Yi Zhang yi.zhang@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: Parav Pandit parav@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit parav@mellanox.com
I never understood why bad habits are so stinky.
Can you please explain us what does it mean Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by of the same person in the same patch?
See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what that tag means.
Read it, it doesn't help me to understand if I should now add Co-developed-by tag to most of RDMA Mellanox upstreamed patches, which already care my Signed-off-by, because I'm changing and fixing them many times.
Maybe I should write for my upstreamed patched something like this? Co-developed-by: Leon R... Reviewed-By: Leon R... Tested-by: Leon R... Signed-by: Leon R...
Thanks
thanks,
greg k-h