The WMI method to set the charge threshold does not provide a way to specific a battery, so we assume it is the first/primary battery (by checking if the name is BAT0). On some newer ASUS laptops (Zenbook UM431DA) though, the primary/first battery isn't named BAT0 but BATT, so we need to support that case.
Fixes: 7973353e92ee ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor charge threshold to use the battery hooking API") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kristian Klausen kristian@klausen.dk --- I'm not sure if this is candidate for -stable, it fix a real bug (charge threshold doesn't work on newer ASUS laptops) which has been reported by a user[1], but is that enough? I had a quick look at[2], can this be considered a "something critical"? It "bothers people"[1]. My point: I'm not sure..
I'm unsure if there is a bettery way to fix this. Maybe a counter would be better (+1 for every new battery)? It would probably need to be atomic to prevent race condition (I'm not sure how this code is run), but this "fix" is way simpler.
Please do not accept this patch just yet, I'm waiting for the tester to either confirm or deny credit[3].
[1] https://gist.github.com/klausenbusk/643f15320ae8997427155c38be13e445#gistcom... [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.5/process/stable-kernel-rules.html [3] https://gist.github.com/klausenbusk/643f15320ae8997427155c38be13e445#gistcom...
v3: Add Fixes.
v2: Add base commit Remove uneeded parenthesis and adjust styling
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c index 612ef5526226..01becbe2a9a8 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c @@ -426,8 +426,11 @@ static int asus_wmi_battery_add(struct power_supply *battery) { /* The WMI method does not provide a way to specific a battery, so we * just assume it is the first battery. + * Note: On some newer ASUS laptops (Zenbook UM431DA), the primary/first + * battery is named BATT. */ - if (strcmp(battery->desc->name, "BAT0") != 0) + if (strcmp(battery->desc->name, "BAT0") != 0 && + strcmp(battery->desc->name, "BATT") != 0) return -ENODEV;
if (device_create_file(&battery->dev,
base-commit: 11a48a5a18c63fd7621bb050228cebf13566e4d8