5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Masahiro Yamada masahiroy@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 77dc55a978e69625f9718460012e5ef0172dc4de ]
When building a 64-bit kernel on a 32-bit build host, incorrect input MODULE_ALIAS() entries may be generated.
For example, when compiling a 64-bit kernel with CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=m on a 64-bit build machine, you will get the correct output:
$ grep MODULE_ALIAS drivers/input/mousedev.mod.c MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*2,*k*110,*r*0,*1,*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*2,*k*r*8,*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*14A,*r*a*0,*1,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*145,*r*a*0,*1,*18,*1C,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*110,*r*a*0,*1,*m*l*s*f*w*");
However, building the same kernel on a 32-bit machine results in incorrect output:
$ grep MODULE_ALIAS drivers/input/mousedev.mod.c MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*2,*k*110,*130,*r*0,*1,*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*2,*k*r*8,*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*14A,*16A,*r*a*0,*1,*20,*21,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*145,*165,*r*a*0,*1,*18,*1C,*20,*21,*38,*3C,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*3,*k*110,*130,*r*a*0,*1,*20,*21,*m*l*s*f*w*");
A similar issue occurs with CONFIG_INPUT_JOYDEV=m. On a 64-bit build machine, the output is:
$ grep MODULE_ALIAS drivers/input/joydev.mod.c MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*0,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*2,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*8,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*6,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*120,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*130,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*2C0,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*");
However, on a 32-bit machine, the output is incorrect:
$ grep MODULE_ALIAS drivers/input/joydev.mod.c MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*0,*20,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*2,*22,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*8,*28,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*3,*k*r*a*6,*26,*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*11F,*13F,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*11F,*13F,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*"); MODULE_ALIAS("input:b*v*p*e*-e*1,*k*2C0,*2E0,*r*a*m*l*s*f*w*");
When building a 64-bit kernel, BITS_PER_LONG is defined as 64. However, on a 32-bit build machine, the constant 1L is a signed 32-bit value. Left-shifting it beyond 32 bits causes wraparound, and shifting by 31 or 63 bits makes it a negative value.
The fix in commit e0e92632715f ("[PATCH] PATCH: 1 line 2.6.18 bugfix: modpost-64bit-fix.patch") is incorrect; it only addresses cases where a 64-bit kernel is built on a 64-bit build machine, overlooking cases on a 32-bit build machine.
Using 1ULL ensures a 64-bit width on both 32-bit and 64-bit machines, avoiding the wraparound issue.
Fixes: e0e92632715f ("[PATCH] PATCH: 1 line 2.6.18 bugfix: modpost-64bit-fix.patch") Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada masahiroy@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: bf36b4bf1b9a ("modpost: fix the missed iteration for the max bit in do_input()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- scripts/mod/file2alias.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c index 1c9c33f491e6..2febe2b8bedb 100644 --- a/scripts/mod/file2alias.c +++ b/scripts/mod/file2alias.c @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static void do_input(char *alias, for (i = min / BITS_PER_LONG; i < max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1; i++) arr[i] = TO_NATIVE(arr[i]); for (i = min; i < max; i++) - if (arr[i / BITS_PER_LONG] & (1L << (i%BITS_PER_LONG))) + if (arr[i / BITS_PER_LONG] & (1ULL << (i%BITS_PER_LONG))) sprintf(alias + strlen(alias), "%X,*", i); }