On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:10:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.98 release. There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.98-rc1.... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. We have two major regressions.
As I have reported on 6.9.9-rc1 same kernel BUG and panic noticed [1] while running kunit tests on all test environments [1] seen on 6.1.98-rc1.
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xb0/0x17c
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsqkB4=pVZyELyj3YqUc9jXFfgNULsPk9t8q-+P...
S390 build failed due to following build errors on 6.1 and 6.6. Build error:
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:253:11: error: expected ';' at end of declaration 253 | psw_t psw __uninitialized; | ^ | ; [2] https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2j0YAKrnHmvjt4fKPfYoE...
Thanks, I'll go drop this from 6.6 and older queues now, seems that __unitialized doesn't work on older kernels just yet.
thanks,
greg k-h