On 2017-11-11 17:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
Fix child-node lookup during probe, which ended up searching the whole device tree depth-first starting at parent rather than just matching on its children.
Later sanity checks on node properties (which would likely be missing) should prevent this from causing much trouble however, especially as the original premature free of the parent node has already been fixed separately (but that "fix" was apparently never backported to stable).
Fixes: e7ec014a47e4 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - update for device tree support") Fixes: c52c545ead97 ("Input: twl6040-vibra - fix DT node memory management") Cc: stable stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.6
Note that of_get_child_by_name() is not present in 3.6, this was the reason the original implementation was using of_find_node_by_name()
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com Cc: H. Nikolaus Schaller hns@goldelico.com Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org
drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c index 5690eb7ff954..15e0d352c4cc 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c @@ -248,8 +248,7 @@ static int twl6040_vibra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) int vddvibr_uV = 0; int error;
- of_node_get(twl6040_core_dev->of_node);
- twl6040_core_node = of_find_node_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node,
- twl6040_core_node = of_get_child_by_name(twl6040_core_dev->of_node, "vibra"); if (!twl6040_core_node) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "parent of node is missing?\n");
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki