6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar skb99@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit 4107a1aeb20ed4cdad6a0d49de92ea0f933c71b7 ]
On powerpc, a CPU does not necessarily originate from NUMA node 0. This contrasts with architectures like x86, where CPU 0 is not hot-pluggable, making NUMA node 0 a consistently valid node. This discrepancy can lead to failures when creating a map on NUMA node 0, which is initialized by default, if no CPUs are allocated from NUMA node 0.
This patch fixes the issue by setting NUMA_NO_NODE (-1) for map creation for this selftest.
Fixes: 96eabe7a40aa ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation") Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar skb99@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Acked-by: Yonghong Song yonghong.song@linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cf1f61468b47425ecf3728689bc9636ddd1d910e.1738302... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c index cc184e4420f6e..67557cda22083 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ #include <test_progs.h> #include "bloom_filter_map.skel.h"
+#ifndef NUMA_NO_NODE +#define NUMA_NO_NODE (-1) +#endif + static void test_fail_cases(void) { LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts); @@ -69,6 +73,7 @@ static void test_success_cases(void)
/* Create a map */ opts.map_flags = BPF_F_ZERO_SEED | BPF_F_NUMA_NODE; + opts.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER, NULL, 0, sizeof(value), 100, &opts); if (!ASSERT_GE(fd, 0, "bpf_map_create bloom filter success case")) return;