4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
commit 07458f6a5171d97511dfbdf6ce549ed2ca0280c7 upstream.
'cached_raw_freq' is used to get the next frequency quickly but should always be in sync with sg_policy->next_freq. There is a case where it is not and in such cases it should be reset to avoid switching to incorrect frequencies.
Consider this case for example:
- policy->cur is 1.2 GHz (Max) - New request comes for 780 MHz and we store that in cached_raw_freq. - Based on 780 MHz, we calculate the effective frequency as 800 MHz. - We then see the CPU wasn't idle recently and choose to keep the next freq as 1.2 GHz. - Now we have cached_raw_freq is 780 MHz and sg_policy->next_freq is 1.2 GHz. - Now if the utilization doesn't change in then next request, then the next target frequency will still be 780 MHz and it will match with cached_raw_freq. But we will choose 1.2 GHz instead of 800 MHz here.
Fixes: b7eaf1aab9f8 (cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs prematurely) Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -282,8 +282,12 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle * recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then. */ - if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) + if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) { next_f = sg_policy->next_freq; + + /* Reset cached freq as next_freq has changed */ + sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0; + } } sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f); }