[ backport for 4.14 of 7f4dae2d7f03d2aaf3b7d8343d4509c8d9d7ca9b ]
Jindřich Makovička says: The logical OR looks fishy to me. Shouldn't be && there instead?
Link: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org --- net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c index a684234bd229..eb7db31dd173 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_hash.c @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void *nft_hash_deactivate(const struct net *net, hash = nft_jhash(set, priv, &this->ext); hlist_for_each_entry(he, &priv->table[hash], node) { if (!memcmp(nft_set_ext_key(&this->ext), &elem->key.val, - set->klen) || + set->klen) && nft_set_elem_active(&he->ext, genmask)) { nft_set_elem_change_active(net, set, &he->ext); return he;