6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
[ Upstream commit 14a3d3ef02ba53447d5112a2641aac0d10dc994f ]
We can now undo parts of 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error") as discussed in [0].
Given the BPF helpers now have MEM_WRITE tag, the MEM_UNINIT can be cleared.
The mtu_len is an input as well as output argument, meaning, the BPF program has to set it to something. It cannot be uninitialized. Therefore, allowing uninitialized memory and zeroing it on error would be odd. It was done as an interim step in 4b3786a6c539 as the desired behavior could not have been expressed before the introduction of MEM_WRITE tag.
Fixes: 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/a86eb76d-f52f-dee4-e5d2-87e45de3e16f@iogearbox.n... [0] Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi memxor@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-3-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/core/filter.c | 42 +++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index a7d928345b1f4..a2467a7c01f9e 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -6223,24 +6223,16 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_skb_check_mtu, struct sk_buff *, skb, { int ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED; struct net_device *dev = skb->dev; - int skb_len, dev_len; - int mtu = 0; + int mtu, dev_len, skb_len;
- if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS))) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } - - if (unlikely(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && (len_diff || *mtu_len))) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } + if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS))) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(flags & BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS && (len_diff || *mtu_len))) + return -EINVAL;
dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex); - if (unlikely(!dev)) { - ret = -ENODEV; - goto out; - } + if (unlikely(!dev)) + return -ENODEV;
mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu); dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len; @@ -6275,19 +6267,15 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_xdp_check_mtu, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, struct net_device *dev = xdp->rxq->dev; int xdp_len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data; int ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_SUCCESS; - int mtu = 0, dev_len; + int mtu, dev_len;
/* XDP variant doesn't support multi-buffer segment check (yet) */ - if (unlikely(flags)) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } + if (unlikely(flags)) + return -EINVAL;
dev = __dev_via_ifindex(dev, ifindex); - if (unlikely(!dev)) { - ret = -ENODEV; - goto out; - } + if (unlikely(!dev)) + return -ENODEV;
mtu = READ_ONCE(dev->mtu); dev_len = mtu + dev->hard_header_len; @@ -6299,7 +6287,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_xdp_check_mtu, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, xdp_len += len_diff; /* minus result pass check */ if (xdp_len > dev_len) ret = BPF_MTU_CHK_RET_FRAG_NEEDED; -out: + *mtu_len = mtu; return ret; } @@ -6310,7 +6298,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_skb_check_mtu_proto = { .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, - .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, + .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, .arg3_size = sizeof(u32), .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING, .arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING, @@ -6322,7 +6310,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_xdp_check_mtu_proto = { .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, - .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_UNINIT | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, + .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM | MEM_WRITE | MEM_ALIGNED, .arg3_size = sizeof(u32), .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING, .arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING,