6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Leon Hwang hffilwlqm@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 2b5dcb31a19a2e0acd869b12c9db9b2d696ef544 ]
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram. 2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram. 3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt the machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.
Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang hffilwlqm@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++ kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 4 ++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 5ab531be56acf..7ee72917f13cb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -963,6 +963,10 @@ static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
+/* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */ +#define RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack) \ + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85, -round_up(stack, 8) - 8) + static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image, int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding) { @@ -1538,9 +1542,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32; if (tail_call_reachable) { - /* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */ - EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85, - -round_up(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth, 8) - 8); + RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth); if (!imm32) return -EINVAL; offs = 7 + x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func); @@ -2307,6 +2309,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i * [ ... ] * [ stack_arg2 ] * RBP - arg_stack_off [ stack_arg1 ] + * RSP [ tail_call_cnt ] BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX */
/* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */ @@ -2371,6 +2374,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i else /* sub rsp, stack_size */ EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size); + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX) + EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */ /* mov QWORD PTR [rbp - rbx_off], rbx */ emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_6, -rbx_off);
@@ -2423,9 +2428,15 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off); save_args(m, &prog, arg_stack_off, true);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX) + /* Before calling the original function, restore the + * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax. + */ + RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size); + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) { - emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8); - EMIT2(0xff, 0xd0); /* call *rax */ + emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_FP, 8); + EMIT2(0xff, 0xd3); /* call *rbx */ } else { /* call original function */ if (emit_rsb_call(&prog, orig_call, prog)) { @@ -2476,7 +2487,12 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i ret = -EINVAL; goto cleanup; } - } + } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX) + /* Before running the original function, restore the + * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax. + */ + RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size); + /* restore return value of orig_call or fentry prog back into RAX */ if (save_ret) emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, -8); diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 6ba9d3ed8f0b0..98a7d6fd10360 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1016,6 +1016,11 @@ struct btf_func_model { */ #define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to + * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop. + */ +#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7) + /* Each call __bpf_prog_enter + call bpf_func + call __bpf_prog_exit is ~50 * bytes on x86. */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c index 53ff50cac61ea..e97aeda3a86b5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c @@ -415,8 +415,8 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut goto out; }
- /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY */ - tr->flags &= BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY; + /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL_CTX */ + tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX);
if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links || tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 104681258d24f..6c52055916287 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -19384,6 +19384,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (!tr) return -ENOMEM;
+ if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) + tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX; + prog->aux->dst_trampoline = tr; return 0; }