From: Andrey Ryabinin aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
commit bdb5ac801af3d81d36732c2f640d6a1d3df83826 upstream.
Instead of having two identical __read_once_size_nocheck() functions with different attributes, consolidate all the difference in new macro __no_kasan_or_inline and use it. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts matthieu.baerts@tessares.net --- include/linux/compiler.h | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h index a704d032713b..f490d8d93ec3 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h @@ -185,23 +185,21 @@ void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN /* - * This function is not 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address confilcts + * We can't declare function 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address confilcts * with inlining. Attempt to inline it may cause a build failure. * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67368 * '__maybe_unused' allows us to avoid defined-but-not-used warnings. */ -static __no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused -void __read_once_size_nocheck(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size) -{ - __READ_ONCE_SIZE; -} +# define __no_kasan_or_inline __no_sanitize_address __maybe_unused #else -static __always_inline +# define __no_kasan_or_inline __always_inline +#endif + +static __no_kasan_or_inline void __read_once_size_nocheck(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size) { __READ_ONCE_SIZE; } -#endif
static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int size) {