4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch
[ Upstream commit 75c05a74e745ae7d663b04d75777af80ada2233c ]
The ATU port vector contains a bit per port of the switch. The code wrongly used it as a port number, and incremented a port counter. This resulted in the wrong interfaces counter being incremented, and potentially going off the end of the array of ports.
Fix this by using the source port ID for the violation, which really is a port number.
Reported-by: Chris Healy Chris.Healy@zii.aero Tested-by: Chris Healy Chris.Healy@zii.aero Fixes: 65f60e4582bd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Keep ATU/VTU violation statistics") Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn andrew@lunn.ch Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob { struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id; struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry entry; + int spid; int err; u16 val;
@@ -336,6 +337,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob if (err) goto out;
+ spid = entry.state; + if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_AGE_OUT_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, "ATU age out violation for %pM\n", @@ -344,23 +347,23 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MEMBER_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_member_violation++; + "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_member_violation++; }
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MISS_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_miss_violation++; + "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_miss_violation++; }
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_FULL_VIOLATION) { dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev, - "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x\n", - entry.mac, entry.portvec); - chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_full_violation++; + "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n", + entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid); + chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++; } mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);