6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vladimir Kondratiev vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com
[ Upstream commit b93afe8a3ac53ae52296d65acfaa9c5f582a48cc ]
RISC-V APLIC specification defines "hart index" in:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia
Within a given interrupt domain, each of the domain’s harts has a unique index number in the range 0 to 2^14 − 1 (= 16,383). The index number a domain associates with a hart may or may not have any relationship to the unique hart identifier (“hart ID”) that the RISC-V Privileged Architecture assigns to the hart. Two different interrupt domains may employ entirely different index numbers for the same set of harts.
Further, this document says in "4.5 Memory-mapped control region for an interrupt domain":
The array of IDC structures may include some for potential hart index numbers that are not actual hart index numbers in the domain. For example, the first IDC structure is always for hart index 0, but 0 is not necessarily a valid index number for any hart in the domain.
Support arbitrary hart indices specified in an optional APLIC property "riscv,hart-indexes" which is specified as an array of u32 elements, one per interrupt target. If this property is not specified, fallback to use logical hart indices within the domain.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reviewed-by: Anup Patel anup@brainfault.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250129091637.1667279-3-vladimir.kondratiev@mob... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c index 7cd6b646774b9..205ad61d15e49 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-direct.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct aplic_direct { };
struct aplic_idc { - unsigned int hart_index; + u32 hart_index; void __iomem *regs; struct aplic_direct *direct; }; @@ -219,6 +219,20 @@ static int aplic_direct_parse_parent_hwirq(struct device *dev, u32 index, return 0; }
+static int aplic_direct_get_hart_index(struct device *dev, u32 logical_index, + u32 *hart_index) +{ + const char *prop_hart_index = "riscv,hart-indexes"; + struct device_node *np = to_of_node(dev->fwnode); + + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, prop_hart_index)) { + *hart_index = logical_index; + return 0; + } + + return of_property_read_u32_index(np, prop_hart_index, logical_index, hart_index); +} + int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs) { int i, j, rc, cpu, current_cpu, setup_count = 0; @@ -265,8 +279,12 @@ int aplic_direct_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs) cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &direct->lmask);
idc = per_cpu_ptr(&aplic_idcs, cpu); - idc->hart_index = i; - idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + i * APLIC_IDC_SIZE; + rc = aplic_direct_get_hart_index(dev, i, &idc->hart_index); + if (rc) { + dev_warn(dev, "hart index not found for IDC%d\n", i); + continue; + } + idc->regs = priv->regs + APLIC_IDC_BASE + idc->hart_index * APLIC_IDC_SIZE; idc->direct = direct;
aplic_idc_set_delivery(idc, true);