From: Hans Verkuil hans.verkuil@cisco.com
[ Upstream commit a4c30a4861c54af78c4eb8b7855524c1a96d9f80 ]
When parsing the reply of a DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ DPCD command the result is wrong due to a missing idx increment.
This was never noticed since DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ is currently not used, but if you enable it, then it is all wrong.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil hans.verkuil@cisco.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Acked-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e72ddac2-1dc0-100a-d816-9ac98a... Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 9d94c306c8ca1..a4bf98e6af57d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static bool drm_dp_sideband_parse_remote_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx if (idx > raw->curlen) goto fail_len; repmsg->u.remote_dpcd_read_ack.num_bytes = raw->msg[idx]; + idx++; if (idx > raw->curlen) goto fail_len;