5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Weißschuh thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de
[ Upstream commit a5039648f86424885aae37f03dc39bc9cb972ecb ]
In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer values into the kernel log. Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p") the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue. Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.
Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and easier to reason about.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250811-restricted-pointers-soc-v2-1-7af7ed993546... Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c index 30695172a508f..bf2ba4c8595ba 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int pruss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pruss->mem_regions[i].pa = res.start; pruss->mem_regions[i].size = resource_size(&res);
- dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: pa %pa size 0x%zx va %pK\n", + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: pa %pa size 0x%zx va %p\n", mem_names[i], &pruss->mem_regions[i].pa, pruss->mem_regions[i].size, pruss->mem_regions[i].va); }