From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" gpiccoli@igalia.com
[ Upstream commit 08d7becc1a6b8c936e25d827becabfe3bff72a36 ]
Right now, if the clocksource watchdog detects a clocksource skew, it might perform a per CPU check, for example in the TSC case on x86. In other words: supposing TSC is detected as unstable by the clocksource watchdog running at CPU1, as part of marking TSC unstable the kernel will also run a check of TSC readings on some CPUs to be sure it is synced between them all.
But that check happens only on some CPUs, not all of them; this choice is based on the parameter "verify_n_cpus" and in some random cpumask calculation. So, the watchdog runs such per CPU checks on up to "verify_n_cpus" random CPUs among all online CPUs, with the risk of repeating CPUs (that aren't double checked) in the cpumask random calculation.
But if "verify_n_cpus" > num_online_cpus(), it should skip the random calculation and just go ahead and check the clocksource sync between all online CPUs, without the risk of skipping some CPUs due to duplicity in the random cpumask calculation.
Tests in a 4 CPU laptop with TSC skew detected led to some cases of the per CPU verification skipping some CPU even with verify_n_cpus=8, due to the duplicity on random cpumask generation. Skipping the randomization when the number of online CPUs is smaller than verify_n_cpus, solves that.
Suggested-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo cascardo@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli gpiccoli@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250323173857.372390-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org ---
Perfect! Now I understand the issue. Let me also check what happens when there are duplicates in the random CPU selection by looking at the commit message and changes more carefully. **Analysis:** **YES** - This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees. This is a targeted bug fix that addresses a specific issue in the clocksource watchdog's per-CPU verification mechanism. Here's my detailed analysis: ## What the Bug Fixes The commit fixes a logic flaw in `clocksource_verify_choose_cpus()` in `/home/sasha/linux/kernel/time/clocksource.c:309`. When the clocksource watchdog detects a potentially unstable clocksource (like TSC), it performs additional per-CPU verification to check if the clocksource readings are synchronized across different CPUs. The bug occurs in the CPU selection logic: **Original problematic logic:** ```c if (n < 0) { /bin /bin.usr-is-merged /boot /dev /etc /home /init /lib /lib.usr-is- merged /lib64 /lost+found /media /mnt /opt /proc /root /run /sbin /sbin.usr-is-merged /snap /srv /sys /tmp /usr /var Check all of the CPUs. model/ prompt/ src/ target/ cpumask_copy(&cpus_chosen, cpu_online_mask); cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &cpus_chosen); return; } ``` **Fixed logic:** ```c if (n < 0 || n >= num_online_cpus()) { /bin /bin.usr-is-merged /boot /dev /etc /home /init /lib /lib.usr-is- merged /lib64 /lost+found /media /mnt /opt /proc /root /run /sbin /sbin.usr-is-merged /snap /srv /sys /tmp /usr /var Check all of the CPUs. model/ prompt/ src/ target/ cpumask_copy(&cpus_chosen, cpu_online_mask); cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &cpus_chosen); return; } ``` ## The Problem When `verify_n_cpus` (default value 8) is greater than `num_online_cpus()`, the code would fall through to the random CPU selection logic, which has a critical flaw: it can select the same CPU multiple times due to the random nature of `get_random_u32_below()`. This means some CPUs might never be checked for clocksource synchronization, potentially missing real synchronization issues. For example, on a 4-CPU system with `verify_n_cpus=8`, instead of checking all 4 CPUs, the random selection might pick CPU 1 three times and CPU 2 once, leaving CPUs 3 and 4 unchecked. ## Why This Should Be Backported 1. **Fixes a Real Bug**: This addresses an actual functional issue where clocksource verification might miss CPUs, potentially failing to detect real synchronization problems. 2. **Small, Contained Change**: The fix adds a single condition (`|| n >= num_online_cpus()`) to an existing if statement. This is minimal and low-risk. 3. **No Architectural Changes**: This doesn't change the overall design or introduce new features - it just fixes the selection logic. 4. **Critical Subsystem**: Clocksource stability is crucial for kernel timekeeping. Missing synchronization issues could lead to time-related bugs. 5. **Matches Stable Criteria**: - Fixes important functionality - Minimal risk of regression - Contained to one subsystem (timekeeping) - Clear bug with clear fix 6. **Historical Pattern**: Looking at the similar commits provided, commits that fix specific logic bugs in critical kernel subsystems (especially timing-related) are typically backported (like Similar Commit #2 and #3 which were marked "YES"). ## Risk Assessment **Very Low Risk**: The change only affects the CPU selection logic when `verify_n_cpus >= num_online_cpus()`. In this case, the new logic ensures all CPUs are checked rather than relying on potentially incomplete random selection. This is strictly an improvement with no downside. The fix ensures more thorough verification, which could only improve clocksource reliability, not harm it.
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 32efc87c41f20..57575be840c5a 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static void clocksource_verify_choose_cpus(void) { int cpu, i, n = verify_n_cpus;
- if (n < 0) { + if (n < 0 || n >= num_online_cpus()) { /* Check all of the CPUs. */ cpumask_copy(&cpus_chosen, cpu_online_mask); cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &cpus_chosen);