In this instance I honestly haven't read the LLM explanation. I agree with you that the explanation is flawed, but the patch clearly fixes a problem:
"On AMD dGPUs this can lead to failed suspends under memory pressure situations as all VRAM must be evicted to system memory or swap."
So it was included in the AUTOSEL patchset.
Is "may fix a problem" the only criteria for -stable inclusion? You have been acting as if so. Please update the rules, if so.
I assume going forward that AUTOSEL will not consider any patches involving the core kernel and the user/kernel ABI going forward. The areas I have been involved with over the years, and for which my review might be interesting.
The filter is based on authorship and SoBs. Individual maintainers of a subsystem can elect to have their entire subsystem added to the ignore list.
Then the filter is misdesigned.
BR, Pavel