6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Benjamin Berg benjamin.berg@intel.com
[ Upstream commit c485ca3aff2442adea4c08ceb5183e671ebed22a ]
There is no errno variable when NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO is defined. As such, simply print the message with "unknown error" rather than the integer value of errno.
Fixes: acab7bcdb1bc ("tools/nolibc/stdio: add perror() to report the errno value") Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg benjamin.berg@intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh linux@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h index cae402c11e575..36952314eef6f 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h @@ -352,7 +352,11 @@ int printf(const char *fmt, ...) static __attribute__((unused)) void perror(const char *msg) { +#ifdef NOLIBC_IGNORE_ERRNO + fprintf(stderr, "%s%sunknown error\n", (msg && *msg) ? msg : "", (msg && *msg) ? ": " : ""); +#else fprintf(stderr, "%s%serrno=%d\n", (msg && *msg) ? msg : "", (msg && *msg) ? ": " : "", errno); +#endif }
static __attribute__((unused))