6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 22ae4c114f77b55a4c5036e8f70409a0799a08f8 ]
We don't really care whether there are hashed entries when it comes to scheduling the laundrette. They might all be non-gc entries, after all. We only want to schedule it if there are entries on the LRU.
Switch to using list_lru_count, and move the check into nfsd_file_gc_worker. The other callsite in nfsd_file_put doesn't need to count entries, since it only schedules the laundrette after adding an entry to the LRU.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever chuck.lever@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c @@ -211,12 +211,9 @@ static const struct rhashtable_params nf static void nfsd_file_schedule_laundrette(void) { - if ((atomic_read(&nfsd_file_rhash_tbl.nelems) == 0) || - test_bit(NFSD_FILE_CACHE_UP, &nfsd_file_flags) == 0) - return; - - queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &nfsd_filecache_laundrette, - NFSD_LAUNDRETTE_DELAY); + if (test_bit(NFSD_FILE_CACHE_UP, &nfsd_file_flags)) + queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &nfsd_filecache_laundrette, + NFSD_LAUNDRETTE_DELAY); }
static void @@ -614,7 +611,8 @@ static void nfsd_file_gc_worker(struct work_struct *work) { nfsd_file_gc(); - nfsd_file_schedule_laundrette(); + if (list_lru_count(&nfsd_file_lru)) + nfsd_file_schedule_laundrette(); }
static unsigned long