6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ignat Korchagin ignat@cloudflare.com
[ Upstream commit 7e0f122c65912740327e4c54472acaa5f85868cb ]
Commit d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") added some validation of NFPROTO_* families in the nft_compat module, but it broke the ability to use legacy iptables modules in dual-stack nftables.
While with legacy iptables one had to independently manage IPv4 and IPv6 tables, with nftables it is possible to have dual-stack tables sharing the rules. Moreover, it was possible to use rules based on legacy iptables match/target modules in dual-stack nftables.
As an example, the program from [2] creates an INET dual-stack family table using an xt_bpf based rule, which looks like the following (the actual output was generated with a patched nft tool as the current nft tool does not parse dual stack tables with legacy match rules, so consider it for illustrative purposes only):
table inet testfw { chain input { type filter hook prerouting priority filter; policy accept; bytecode counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept } }
After d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") we get EOPNOTSUPP for the above program.
Fix this by allowing NFPROTO_INET for nft_(match/target)_validate(), but also restrict the functions to classic iptables hooks.
Changes in v3: * clarify that upstream nft will not display such configuration properly and that the output was generated with a patched nft tool * remove example program from commit description and link to it instead * no code changes otherwise
Changes in v2: * restrict nft_(match/target)_validate() to classic iptables hooks * rewrite example program to use unmodified libnftnl
Fixes: d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zc1PfoWN38UuFJRI@calendula/T/#mc947262582c90fec0... [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240220145509.53357-1-ignat@cloudflare.com/ [2] Reported-by: Jordan Griege jgriege@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin ignat@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c index 1f9474fefe849..d3d11dede5450 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c @@ -359,10 +359,20 @@ static int nft_target_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 && ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 && + ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET && ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE && ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain, + (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) | + (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) | + (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) | + (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) | + (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING)); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) { const struct nft_base_chain *basechain = nft_base_chain(ctx->chain); @@ -610,10 +620,20 @@ static int nft_match_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 && ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 && + ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET && ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE && ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain, + (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) | + (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) | + (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) | + (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) | + (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING)); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) { const struct nft_base_chain *basechain = nft_base_chain(ctx->chain);