6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: mfreemon@cloudflare.com mfreemon@cloudflare.com
[ Upstream commit b650d953cd391595e536153ce30b4aab385643ac ]
Under certain circumstances, the tcp receive buffer memory limit set by autotuning (sk_rcvbuf) is increased due to incoming data packets as a result of the window not closing when it should be. This can result in the receive buffer growing all the way up to tcp_rmem[2], even for tcp sessions with a low BDP.
To reproduce: Connect a TCP session with the receiver doing nothing and the sender sending small packets (an infinite loop of socket send() with 4 bytes of payload with a sleep of 1 ms in between each send()). This will cause the tcp receive buffer to grow all the way up to tcp_rmem[2].
As a result, a host can have individual tcp sessions with receive buffers of size tcp_rmem[2], and the host itself can reach tcp_mem limits, causing the host to go into tcp memory pressure mode.
The fundamental issue is the relationship between the granularity of the window scaling factor and the number of byte ACKed back to the sender. This problem has previously been identified in RFC 7323, appendix F [1].
The Linux kernel currently adheres to never shrinking the window.
In addition to the overallocation of memory mentioned above, the current behavior is functionally incorrect, because once tcp_rmem[2] is reached when no remediations remain (i.e. tcp collapse fails to free up any more memory and there are no packets to prune from the out-of-order queue), the receiver will drop in-window packets resulting in retransmissions and an eventual timeout of the tcp session. A receive buffer full condition should instead result in a zero window and an indefinite wait.
In practice, this problem is largely hidden for most flows. It is not applicable to mice flows. Elephant flows can send data fast enough to "overrun" the sk_rcvbuf limit (in a single ACK), triggering a zero window.
But this problem does show up for other types of flows. Examples are websockets and other type of flows that send small amounts of data spaced apart slightly in time. In these cases, we directly encounter the problem described in [1].
RFC 7323, section 2.4 [2], says there are instances when a retracted window can be offered, and that TCP implementations MUST ensure that they handle a shrinking window, as specified in RFC 1122, section 4.2.2.16 [3]. All prior RFCs on the topic of tcp window management have made clear that sender must accept a shrunk window from the receiver, including RFC 793 [4] and RFC 1323 [5].
This patch implements the functionality to shrink the tcp window when necessary to keep the right edge within the memory limit by autotuning (sk_rcvbuf). This new functionality is enabled with the new sysctl: net.ipv4.tcp_shrink_window
Additional information can be found at: https://blog.cloudflare.com/unbounded-memory-usage-by-tcp-for-receive-buffer...
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7323#appendix-F [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7323#section-2.4 [3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122#page-91 [4] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc793 [5] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1323
Signed-off-by: Mike Freemon mfreemon@cloudflare.com Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 15 +++++++ include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 + net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 9 ++++ net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 + net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst index f5f7a464605f9..b47b3d0ce5596 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst @@ -967,6 +967,21 @@ tcp_tw_reuse - INTEGER tcp_window_scaling - BOOLEAN Enable window scaling as defined in RFC1323.
+tcp_shrink_window - BOOLEAN + This changes how the TCP receive window is calculated. + + RFC 7323, section 2.4, says there are instances when a retracted + window can be offered, and that TCP implementations MUST ensure + that they handle a shrinking window, as specified in RFC 1122. + + - 0 - Disabled. The window is never shrunk. + - 1 - Enabled. The window is shrunk when necessary to remain within + the memory limit set by autotuning (sk_rcvbuf). + This only occurs if a non-zero receive window + scaling factor is also in effect. + + Default: 0 + tcp_wmem - vector of 3 INTEGERs: min, default, max min: Amount of memory reserved for send buffers for TCP sockets. Each TCP socket has rights to use it due to fact of its birth. diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h index 1b80046794451..ede2ff1da53a3 100644 --- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h +++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct netns_ipv4 { #endif bool fib_has_custom_local_routes; bool fib_offload_disabled; + u8 sysctl_tcp_shrink_window; #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID atomic_t fib_num_tclassid_users; #endif diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c index f68762ce4d8a3..73e5821584c18 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c @@ -1387,6 +1387,15 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = { .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, .extra2 = SYSCTL_TWO, }, + { + .procname = "tcp_shrink_window", + .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_shrink_window, + .maxlen = sizeof(u8), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = proc_dou8vec_minmax, + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE, + }, { } };
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index f9b8a4a1d2edc..5df19f93f86ab 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c @@ -3221,6 +3221,8 @@ static int __net_init tcp_sk_init(struct net *net) else net->ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = &tcp_reno;
+ net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_shrink_window = 0; + return 0; }
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c index 5921b0f6f9f41..443b1cab25299 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) u32 old_win = tp->rcv_wnd; u32 cur_win = tcp_receive_window(tp); u32 new_win = __tcp_select_window(sk); + struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
- /* Never shrink the offered window */ if (new_win < cur_win) { /* Danger Will Robinson! * Don't update rcv_wup/rcv_wnd here or else @@ -269,11 +269,14 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) * * Relax Will Robinson. */ - if (new_win == 0) - NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), - LINUX_MIB_TCPWANTZEROWINDOWADV); - new_win = ALIGN(cur_win, 1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale); + if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_shrink_window) || !tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) { + /* Never shrink the offered window */ + if (new_win == 0) + NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPWANTZEROWINDOWADV); + new_win = ALIGN(cur_win, 1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale); + } } + tp->rcv_wnd = new_win; tp->rcv_wup = tp->rcv_nxt;
@@ -281,7 +284,7 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) * scaled window. */ if (!tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale && - READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_workaround_signed_windows)) + READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_workaround_signed_windows)) new_win = min(new_win, MAX_TCP_WINDOW); else new_win = min(new_win, (65535U << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale)); @@ -293,10 +296,9 @@ static u16 tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) if (new_win == 0) { tp->pred_flags = 0; if (old_win) - NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), - LINUX_MIB_TCPTOZEROWINDOWADV); + NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPTOZEROWINDOWADV); } else if (old_win == 0) { - NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPFROMZEROWINDOWADV); + NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPFROMZEROWINDOWADV); }
return new_win; @@ -2949,6 +2951,7 @@ u32 __tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) { struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + struct net *net = sock_net(sk); /* MSS for the peer's data. Previous versions used mss_clamp * here. I don't know if the value based on our guesses * of peer's MSS is better for the performance. It's more correct @@ -2970,6 +2973,15 @@ u32 __tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) if (mss <= 0) return 0; } + + /* Only allow window shrink if the sysctl is enabled and we have + * a non-zero scaling factor in effect. + */ + if (READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_shrink_window) && tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale) + goto shrink_window_allowed; + + /* do not allow window to shrink */ + if (free_space < (full_space >> 1)) { icsk->icsk_ack.quick = 0;
@@ -3024,6 +3036,36 @@ u32 __tcp_select_window(struct sock *sk) }
return window; + +shrink_window_allowed: + /* new window should always be an exact multiple of scaling factor */ + free_space = round_down(free_space, 1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale); + + if (free_space < (full_space >> 1)) { + icsk->icsk_ack.quick = 0; + + if (tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk)) + tcp_adjust_rcv_ssthresh(sk); + + /* if free space is too low, return a zero window */ + if (free_space < (allowed_space >> 4) || free_space < mss || + free_space < (1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale)) + return 0; + } + + if (free_space > tp->rcv_ssthresh) { + free_space = tp->rcv_ssthresh; + /* new window should always be an exact multiple of scaling factor + * + * For this case, we ALIGN "up" (increase free_space) because + * we know free_space is not zero here, it has been reduced from + * the memory-based limit, and rcv_ssthresh is not a hard limit + * (unlike sk_rcvbuf). + */ + free_space = ALIGN(free_space, (1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale)); + } + + return free_space; }
void tcp_skb_collapse_tstamp(struct sk_buff *skb,