5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jacob Moroni jmoroni@google.com
[ Upstream commit 4dab26bed543584577b64b36aadb8b5b165bf44f ]
In workloads where there are many processes establishing connections using RDMA CM in parallel (large scale MPI), there can be heavy contention for mad_agent_lock in cm_alloc_msg.
This contention can occur while inside of a spin_lock_irq region, leading to interrupts being disabled for extended durations on many cores. Furthermore, it leads to the serialization of rdma_create_ah calls, which has negative performance impacts for NICs which are capable of processing multiple address handle creations in parallel.
The end result is the machine becoming unresponsive, hung task warnings, netdev TX timeouts, etc.
Since the lock appears to be only for protection from cm_remove_one, it can be changed to a rwlock to resolve these issues.
Reproducer:
Server: for i in $(seq 1 512); do ucmatose -c 32 -p $((i + 5000)) & done
Client: for i in $(seq 1 512); do ucmatose -c 32 -p $((i + 5000)) -s 10.2.0.52 & done
Fixes: 76039ac9095f ("IB/cm: Protect cm_dev, cm_ports and mad_agent with kref and lock") Link: https://patch.msgid.link/r/20250220175612.2763122-1-jmoroni@google.com Signed-off-by: Jacob Moroni jmoroni@google.com Acked-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun yanjun.zhu@linux.dev Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c index c8a7fe5fbc233..96e00e86ebbf6 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ struct cm_port { struct cm_device { struct kref kref; struct list_head list; - spinlock_t mad_agent_lock; + rwlock_t mad_agent_lock; struct ib_device *ib_device; u8 ack_delay; int going_down; @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static struct ib_mad_send_buf *cm_alloc_msg(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv) if (!cm_id_priv->av.port) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- spin_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + read_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); mad_agent = cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent; if (!mad_agent) { m = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static struct ib_mad_send_buf *cm_alloc_msg(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv) m->context[0] = cm_id_priv;
out: - spin_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + read_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); return m; }
@@ -1310,10 +1310,10 @@ static __be64 cm_form_tid(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv) if (!cm_id_priv->av.port) return cpu_to_be64(low_tid);
- spin_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + read_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); if (cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent) hi_tid = ((u64)cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent->hi_tid) << 32; - spin_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + read_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); return cpu_to_be64(hi_tid | low_tid); }
@@ -4365,7 +4365,7 @@ static int cm_add_one(struct ib_device *ib_device) return -ENOMEM;
kref_init(&cm_dev->kref); - spin_lock_init(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + rwlock_init(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); cm_dev->ib_device = ib_device; cm_dev->ack_delay = ib_device->attrs.local_ca_ack_delay; cm_dev->going_down = 0; @@ -4481,9 +4481,9 @@ static void cm_remove_one(struct ib_device *ib_device, void *client_data) * The above ensures no call paths from the work are running, * the remaining paths all take the mad_agent_lock. */ - spin_lock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + write_lock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); port->mad_agent = NULL; - spin_unlock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); + write_unlock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock); ib_unregister_mad_agent(mad_agent); ib_port_unregister_client_groups(ib_device, i, cm_counter_groups);