From: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 97683c851f9cdbd3ea55697cbe2dcb6af4287bbd ]
The naming of the regulator is problematic. VCC is usually a supply voltage whereas these devices have a separate VREF pin.
Secondly, the regulator core might have provided a stub regulator if a real regulator wasn't provided. That would in turn have failed to provide a voltage when queried. So reality was that there was no way to use the internal reference.
In order to avoid breaking any dts out in the wild, make sure to fallback to the original vcc naming if vref is not available.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Nuno Sá nuno.sa@analog.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210627163244.1090296-9-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/iio/dac/ad5624r_spi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5624r_spi.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5624r_spi.c index e6c022e1dc1c..17cc8b3fc5d8 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad5624r_spi.c +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad5624r_spi.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int ad5624r_probe(struct spi_device *spi) if (!indio_dev) return -ENOMEM; st = iio_priv(indio_dev); - st->reg = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vcc"); + st->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vref"); if (!IS_ERR(st->reg)) { ret = regulator_enable(st->reg); if (ret) @@ -240,6 +240,22 @@ static int ad5624r_probe(struct spi_device *spi) goto error_disable_reg;
voltage_uv = ret; + } else { + if (PTR_ERR(st->reg) != -ENODEV) + return PTR_ERR(st->reg); + /* Backwards compatibility. This naming is not correct */ + st->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vcc"); + if (!IS_ERR(st->reg)) { + ret = regulator_enable(st->reg); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg); + if (ret < 0) + goto error_disable_reg; + + voltage_uv = ret; + } }
spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);