7 Sep
2018
7 Sep
'18
12:23 a.m.
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:16:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:03:55PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Akshu Agrawal akshu.agrawal@amd.com
[ Upstream commit 9fb4c2bf130b922c77c16a8368732699799c40de ]
Take into account the base delay set in pointer callback.
There are cases where a pointer function populates runtime->delay, such as: ./sound/pci/hda/hda_controller.c ./sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-mfld-platform-pcm.c
I'm worried that if anyone notices this at all they will have already compensated for the delays in userspace and therefore this will cause them to see problems as they get double compenstation for delays.
But what happens when they update to a newer Stable? They're going to hit that issue anyways.