Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2024, 09:49:18 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
Move the "l3_cache" node under the "cpus" node in the dtsi file for Rockchip RK356x SoCs. There's no need for this cache node to be at the higher level.
Fixes: 8612169a05c5 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK356x") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I think the commit message needs a bit more rationale on why this is a stable-worthy fix. Because from the move and commit message it reads like a styling choice ;-) .
I do agree that it makes more sense as child of cpus, but the commit message should also elaborate on why that would matter for stable.
Heiko
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic dsimic@manjaro.org
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi index 4690be841a1c..9f7136e5d553 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi @@ -113,19 +113,19 @@ cpu3: cpu@300 { d-cache-sets = <128>; next-level-cache = <&l3_cache>; };
- };
- /*
* There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
* L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
*/
- l3_cache: l3-cache {
compatible = "cache";
cache-level = <2>;
cache-unified;
cache-size = <0x80000>;
cache-line-size = <64>;
cache-sets = <512>;
/*
* There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
* L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
*/
l3_cache: l3-cache {
compatible = "cache";
cache-level = <2>;
cache-unified;
cache-size = <0x80000>;
cache-line-size = <64>;
cache-sets = <512>;
};};
cpu0_opp_table: opp-table-0 {