On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:04:48PM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:
If there is a burst of message the receive worker will filling up the processing queue but where are too slow to process dlm messages. This patch will slow down the receiver worker to keep the buffer on the socket layer to tell the sender to backoff. This is done by a threshold to get the next buffers from the socket after all messages were processed done by a flush_workqueue(). This however only occurs when we have a message burst when we e.g. create 1 million locks. If we put more and more new messages to process in the processqueue we will soon run out of memory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com
fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c index f7bc22e74db2..67f8dd8a05ef 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ #include "config.h" #define DLM_SHUTDOWN_WAIT_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(5000) +#define DLM_MAX_PROCESS_BUFFERS 24 #define NEEDED_RMEM (4*1024*1024) struct connection { @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct dlm_proto_ops *dlm_proto_ops; #define DLM_IO_END 1 #define DLM_IO_EOF 2 #define DLM_IO_RESCHED 3 +#define DLM_IO_FLUSH 4 static void process_recv_sockets(struct work_struct *work); static void process_send_sockets(struct work_struct *work); @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ static void process_dlm_messages(struct work_struct *work); static DECLARE_WORK(process_work, process_dlm_messages); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(processqueue_lock); static bool process_dlm_messages_pending; +static atomic_t processqueue_count; static LIST_HEAD(processqueue); bool dlm_lowcomms_is_running(void) @@ -874,6 +877,7 @@ static void process_dlm_messages(struct work_struct *work) } list_del(&pentry->list);
- atomic_dec(&processqueue_count); spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
for (;;) { @@ -891,6 +895,7 @@ static void process_dlm_messages(struct work_struct *work) } list_del(&pentry->list);
atomic_dec(&processqueue_count);} @@ -962,6 +967,7 @@ static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con, int buflen) con->rx_leftover); spin_lock(&processqueue_lock);
- ret = atomic_inc_return(&processqueue_count); list_add_tail(&pentry->list, &processqueue); if (!process_dlm_messages_pending) { process_dlm_messages_pending = true;
@@ -969,6 +975,9 @@ static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con, int buflen) } spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
- if (ret > DLM_MAX_PROCESS_BUFFERS)
return DLM_IO_FLUSH;- return DLM_IO_SUCCESS;
} @@ -1503,6 +1512,9 @@ static void process_recv_sockets(struct work_struct *work) wake_up(&con->shutdown_wait); /* CF_RECV_PENDING cleared */ break;
- case DLM_IO_FLUSH:
flush_workqueue(process_workqueue);fallthrough;-- 2.39.3
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>