From: Zhihao Cheng chengzhihao1@huawei.com
commit e6b9bd7290d334451ce054e98e752abc055e0034 upstream.
Following process will make data lost and could lead to a filesystem corrupted problem:
1. jh(bh) is inserted into T1->t_checkpoint_list, bh is dirty, and jh->b_transaction = NULL 2. T1 is added into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions. 3. Get bh prepare to write while doing checkpoing: PA PB do_get_write_access jbd2_log_do_checkpoint spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock) if (buffer_dirty(bh)) clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty set_buffer_jbddirty(bh) transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_list if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh) // bh won't be flushed jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved) 4. Aborting journal/Power-cut before writing latest bh on journal area.
In this way we get a corrupted filesystem with bh's data lost.
Fix it by moving the clearing of buffer_dirty bit just before the call to __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(), both bit clearing and jh->b_transaction assignment are under journal->j_list_lock locked, so that jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() will wait until jh's new transaction fininshed even bh is currently not dirty. And journal_shrink_one_cp_list() won't remove jh from checkpoint list if the buffer head is reused in do_get_write_access().
Fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216898 Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng chengzhihao1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin zhanchengbin1@huawei.com Suggested-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110015327.1181863-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c @@ -1001,36 +1001,28 @@ repeat: * ie. locked but not dirty) or tune2fs (which may actually have * the buffer dirtied, ugh.) */
- if (buffer_dirty(bh)) { + if (buffer_dirty(bh) && jh->b_transaction) { + warn_dirty_buffer(bh); /* - * First question: is this buffer already part of the current - * transaction or the existing committing transaction? - */ - if (jh->b_transaction) { - J_ASSERT_JH(jh, - jh->b_transaction == transaction || - jh->b_transaction == - journal->j_committing_transaction); - if (jh->b_next_transaction) - J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == - transaction); - warn_dirty_buffer(bh); - } - /* - * In any case we need to clean the dirty flag and we must - * do it under the buffer lock to be sure we don't race - * with running write-out. + * We need to clean the dirty flag and we must do it under the + * buffer lock to be sure we don't race with running write-out. */ JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "Journalling dirty buffer"); clear_buffer_dirty(bh); + /* + * The buffer is going to be added to BJ_Reserved list now and + * nothing guarantees jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() will be + * ever called for it. So we need to set jbddirty bit here to + * make sure the buffer is dirtied and written out when the + * journaling machinery is done with it. + */ set_buffer_jbddirty(bh); }
- unlock_buffer(bh); - error = -EROFS; if (is_handle_aborted(handle)) { spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock); + unlock_buffer(bh); goto out; } error = 0; @@ -1040,8 +1032,10 @@ repeat: * b_next_transaction points to it */ if (jh->b_transaction == transaction || - jh->b_next_transaction == transaction) + jh->b_next_transaction == transaction) { + unlock_buffer(bh); goto done; + }
/* * this is the first time this transaction is touching this buffer, @@ -1065,10 +1059,24 @@ repeat: */ smp_wmb(); spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); + if (test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)) { + /* + * Execute buffer dirty clearing and jh->b_transaction + * assignment under journal->j_list_lock locked to + * prevent bh being removed from checkpoint list if + * the buffer is in an intermediate state (not dirty + * and jh->b_transaction is NULL). + */ + JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "Journalling dirty buffer"); + set_buffer_jbddirty(bh); + } __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved); spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); + unlock_buffer(bh); goto done; } + unlock_buffer(bh); + /* * If there is already a copy-out version of this buffer, then we don't * need to make another one