4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com
commit 5a4510c762fc04c74cff264cd4d9e9f5bf364bae upstream.
This was found by a static analyzer. There may be a potential integer overflow issue in unstripe_ctr(). uc->unstripe_offset and uc->unstripe_width are defined as "sector_t"(uint64_t), while uc->unstripe, uc->chunk_size and uc->stripes are all defined as "uint32_t". The result of the calculation will be limited to "uint32_t" without correct casting. So, we recommend adding an extra cast to prevent potential integer overflow.
Fixes: 18a5bf270532 ("dm: add unstriped target") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie zichenxie0106@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka mpatocka@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-unstripe.c @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static int unstripe_ctr(struct dm_target } uc->physical_start = start;
- uc->unstripe_offset = uc->unstripe * uc->chunk_size; - uc->unstripe_width = (uc->stripes - 1) * uc->chunk_size; + uc->unstripe_offset = (sector_t)uc->unstripe * uc->chunk_size; + uc->unstripe_width = (sector_t)(uc->stripes - 1) * uc->chunk_size; uc->chunk_shift = is_power_of_2(uc->chunk_size) ? fls(uc->chunk_size) - 1 : 0;
tmp_len = ti->len;