From: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net
commit e523102cb719cbad1673b6aa2a4d5c1fa6f13799 upstream.
Fix up unprivileged test case results for 'Dest pointer in r0' verifier tests given they now need to reject R0 containing a pointer value, and add a couple of new related ones with 32bit cmpxchg as well.
root@foo:~/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf# ./test_verifier #0/u invalid and of negative number OK #0/p invalid and of negative number OK [...] #1268/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK #1269/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK #1270/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK #1271/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK #1272/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK Summary: 1900 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman jackmanb@google.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem", }, { "Can't use cmpxchg on uninit src reg", @@ -119,7 +121,7 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem", }, { "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 2", @@ -140,5 +142,66 @@ }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R5 leaks addr into mem", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem", +}, +{ + "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 3", + .insns = { + /* r0 = &val */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10), + /* val = r0; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* r5 = &val */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10), + /* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */ + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "invalid size of register fill", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem", +}, +{ + "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 4", + .insns = { + /* r0 = &val */ + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10), + /* val = r0; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* r5 = &val */ + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10), + /* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */ + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8), + /* r1 = *r10 */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -8), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer", +}, +{ + "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 5", + .insns = { + /* r0 = &val */ + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10), + /* val = r0; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* r5 = &val */ + BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10), + /* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */ + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8), + /* r1 = *r0 */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", + .errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer", },