From: Amol Grover frextrite@gmail.com
commit 02d715b4a8182f4887d82df82a7b83aced647760 upstream.
dmar_drhd_units is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu() outside of an RCU read side critical section but under the protection of dmar_global_lock. Hence add corresponding lockdep expression to silence the following false-positive warnings:
[ 1.603975] ============================= [ 1.603976] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 1.603977] 5.5.4-stable #17 Not tainted [ 1.603978] ----------------------------- [ 1.603980] drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c:4769 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
[ 1.603869] ============================= [ 1.603870] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 1.603872] 5.5.4-stable #17 Not tainted [ 1.603874] ----------------------------- [ 1.603875] drivers/iommu/dmar.c:293 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
Tested-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Amol Grover frextrite@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Lu Baolu baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel jroedel@suse.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- include/linux/dmar.h | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/dmar.h +++ b/include/linux/dmar.h @@ -69,8 +69,9 @@ struct dmar_pci_notify_info { extern struct rw_semaphore dmar_global_lock; extern struct list_head dmar_drhd_units;
-#define for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) \ - list_for_each_entry_rcu(drhd, &dmar_drhd_units, list) +#define for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) \ + list_for_each_entry_rcu(drhd, &dmar_drhd_units, list, \ + dmar_rcu_check())
#define for_each_active_drhd_unit(drhd) \ list_for_each_entry_rcu(drhd, &dmar_drhd_units, list) \ @@ -81,7 +82,8 @@ extern struct list_head dmar_drhd_units; if (i=drhd->iommu, drhd->ignored) {} else
#define for_each_iommu(i, drhd) \ - list_for_each_entry_rcu(drhd, &dmar_drhd_units, list) \ + list_for_each_entry_rcu(drhd, &dmar_drhd_units, list, \ + dmar_rcu_check()) \ if (i=drhd->iommu, 0) {} else
static inline bool dmar_rcu_check(void)