On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 08:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, at 10:44, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Did you also check what order libc uses? I would expect libc on SuperH misordering the arguments as well unless I am missing something. Or do we know that the code is actually currently broken?
Yes, I checked glibc, musl and uclibc-ng for all the cases in which the ABI made no sense, as well as to check that my analysis of the kernel sources matches the expectations of the libc.
OK, awesome.
Will you send a v2 so I can ack the updated version of the patch?
I'm also fine with the patch going through your tree, as I would like to start with the changes for v6.11 this week.
I should be able to get a v2 out today and apply that to my asm-generic tree to have in linux-next before I send the pull request.
Arnd