6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com
commit 60caa8b33bd682a9ed99d1fc3f91d74e1acc9922 upstream.
Now that we are reading the full FIFO in the interrupt handler, it is possible to have an emply FIFO since we are still receiving 1 interrupt per data. Handle correctly this case instead of having an error causing a reset of the FIFO.
Fixes: 0829edc43e0a ("iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: read the full fifo when processing data") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219154825.90656-1-inv.git-commit@tdk.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c index 66d4ba088e70..d4f9b5d8d28d 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c @@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ irqreturn_t inv_mpu6050_read_fifo(int irq, void *p) /* compute and process only all complete datum */ nb = fifo_count / bytes_per_datum; fifo_count = nb * bytes_per_datum; + if (nb == 0) + goto end_session; /* Each FIFO data contains all sensors, so same number for FIFO and sensor data */ fifo_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / INV_MPU6050_DIVIDER_TO_FIFO_RATE(st->chip_config.divider); inv_sensors_timestamp_interrupt(&st->timestamp, fifo_period, nb, nb, pf->timestamp);