From: Zhao Heming heming.zhao@suse.com
[ Upstream commit d837f7277f56e70d82b3a4a037d744854e62f387 ]
md_bitmap_get_counter() has code:
``` if (bitmap->bp[page].hijacked || bitmap->bp[page].map == NULL) csize = ((sector_t)1) << (bitmap->chunkshift + PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT - 1); ```
The minus 1 is wrong, this branch should report 2048 bits of space. With "-1" action, this only report 1024 bit of space.
This bug code returns wrong blocks, but it doesn't inflence bitmap logic: 1. Most callers focus this function return value (the counter of offset), not the parameter blocks. 2. The bug is only triggered when hijacked is true or map is NULL. the hijacked true condition is very rare. the "map == null" only true when array is creating or resizing. 3. Even the caller gets wrong blocks, current code makes caller just to call md_bitmap_get_counter() one more time.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming heming.zhao@suse.com Signed-off-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index 95a5f3757fa30..32a96559cb366 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ __acquires(bitmap->lock) if (bitmap->bp[page].hijacked || bitmap->bp[page].map == NULL) csize = ((sector_t)1) << (bitmap->chunkshift + - PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT - 1); + PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT); else csize = ((sector_t)1) << bitmap->chunkshift; *blocks = csize - (offset & (csize - 1));