From: Kaike Wan kaike.wan@intel.com
When an OPFN request is flushed, the request is completed without unreserving itself from the send queue. Subsequently, when a new request is post sent, the following warning will be triggered:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 8130 at rdmavt/qp.c:1761 rvt_post_send+0x72a/0x880 [rdmavt] Call Trace: [<ffffffffbbb61e41>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffffbb497688>] __warn+0xd8/0x100 [<ffffffffbb4977cd>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 [<ffffffffc01c941a>] rvt_post_send+0x72a/0x880 [rdmavt] [<ffffffffbb4dcabe>] ? account_entity_dequeue+0xae/0xd0 [<ffffffffbb61d645>] ? __kmalloc+0x55/0x230 [<ffffffffc04e1a4c>] ib_uverbs_post_send+0x37c/0x5d0 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffc04e5e36>] ? rdma_lookup_put_uobject+0x26/0x60 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffc04dbce6>] ib_uverbs_write+0x286/0x460 [ib_uverbs] [<ffffffffbb6f9457>] ? security_file_permission+0x27/0xa0 [<ffffffffbb641650>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0 [<ffffffffbb64246f>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xf0 [<ffffffffbbb74ddb>] system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27
This patch fixes the problem by moving rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve() into rvt_qp_complete_swqe() to simplify the code and make it less error-prone.
Fixes: ca95f802ef51 ("IB/hfi1: Unreserve a reserved request when it is completed") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190715164528.74174.31364.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn mike.marciniszyn@intel.com Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro dennis.dalessandro@intel.com Signed-off-by: Kaike Wan kaike.wan@intel.com Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn mike.marciniszyn@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@mellanox.com --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c | 2 -- include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h | 9 ++++----- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c index 235bdbc706acc..5c0d90418e8c4 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c @@ -1835,7 +1835,6 @@ void hfi1_rc_send_complete(struct rvt_qp *qp, struct hfi1_opa_header *opah) cmp_psn(qp->s_sending_psn, qp->s_sending_hpsn) <= 0) break; trdma_clean_swqe(qp, wqe); - rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(qp, wqe); trace_hfi1_qp_send_completion(qp, wqe, qp->s_last); rvt_qp_complete_swqe(qp, wqe, @@ -1882,7 +1881,6 @@ struct rvt_swqe *do_rc_completion(struct rvt_qp *qp, if (cmp_psn(wqe->lpsn, qp->s_sending_psn) < 0 || cmp_psn(qp->s_sending_psn, qp->s_sending_hpsn) > 0) { trdma_clean_swqe(qp, wqe); - rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(qp, wqe); trace_hfi1_qp_send_completion(qp, wqe, qp->s_last); rvt_qp_complete_swqe(qp, wqe, diff --git a/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h b/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h index 84d0f36afc2f7..85544777587db 100644 --- a/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h +++ b/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline void rvt_qp_wqe_reserve( /** * rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve - clean reserved operation * @qp - the rvt qp - * @wqe - the send wqe + * @flags - send wqe flags * * This decrements the reserve use count. * @@ -552,11 +552,9 @@ static inline void rvt_qp_wqe_reserve( * the compiler does not juggle the order of the s_last * ring index and the decrementing of s_reserved_used. */ -static inline void rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve( - struct rvt_qp *qp, - struct rvt_swqe *wqe) +static inline void rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(struct rvt_qp *qp, int flags) { - if (unlikely(wqe->wr.send_flags & RVT_SEND_RESERVE_USED)) { + if (unlikely(flags & RVT_SEND_RESERVE_USED)) { atomic_dec(&qp->s_reserved_used); /* insure no compiler re-order up to s_last change */ smp_mb__after_atomic(); @@ -743,6 +741,7 @@ rvt_qp_complete_swqe(struct rvt_qp *qp, u32 byte_len, last; int flags = wqe->wr.send_flags;
+ rvt_qp_wqe_unreserve(qp, flags); rvt_put_qp_swqe(qp, wqe);
need_completion =